How Accurate are Arrestees in Reporting Their Criminal Justice Histories?: Concordance and Accuracy of Self-Reports Compared to Official Records

Bruce D. Johnson; Andrew Golub; Angela Taylor; John Eterno

How Accurate are Arrestees in Reporting Their Criminal Justice Histories?: Concordance and Accuracy of Self-Reports Compared to Official Records

Bruce D. Johnson, Andrew Golub, Angela Taylor, John Eterno

Criminal Justice and Legal Studies

Research & Scholarship: Working paper › Preprint

Abstract

Final Report to National Institute of Justice

Original language	American English
State	Published - Oct 2 2002

Disciplines

Law
Law Enforcement and Corrections
Criminology and Criminal Justice

Cite this

@techreport{96f6bc58df914c7aa386f17dd479626a,

title = "How Accurate are Arrestees in Reporting Their Criminal Justice Histories?: Concordance and Accuracy of Self-Reports Compared to Official Records",

abstract = " Final Report to National Institute of Justice ",

author = "Johnson, {Bruce D.} and Andrew Golub and Angela Taylor and John Eterno",

year = "2002",

month = oct,

day = "2",

language = "American English",

type = "WorkingPaper",

}

TY - UNPB

T1 - How Accurate are Arrestees in Reporting Their Criminal Justice Histories?: Concordance and Accuracy of Self-Reports Compared to Official Records

AU - Johnson, Bruce D.

AU - Golub, Andrew

AU - Taylor, Angela

AU - Eterno, John

PY - 2002/10/2

Y1 - 2002/10/2

N2 - Final Report to National Institute of Justice

AB - Final Report to National Institute of Justice

M3 - Preprint

BT - How Accurate are Arrestees in Reporting Their Criminal Justice Histories?: Concordance and Accuracy of Self-Reports Compared to Official Records

ER -